|
On December 17, 2003, President Bush, the Environmental Protection Agency
and the Army Corps of Engineers announced, “After soliciting public
comment to determine if further regulatory clarification was needed, the
EPA and the Corps have decided to preserve the federal government's authority
to protect our wetlands.” In the face of overwhelming public and
Congressional opposition, the EPA and federal administration has decided
to stop proposed rulemaking that would weaken protection of many waters
of the United States.
Without a doubt, the plan to drop any rulemaking is great news for the
Clean Water Act. However, the guidance directing federal staff still threatens
to jeopardize Georgia’s landscape. According to Joan Mulhern of
Earthjustice, “The nation’s waters will not be fully protected
until the guidance is withdrawn.”
As covered in the Georgia Conservancy’s Spring Panorama cover story,
many feared the administration’s plan to redefine the definition
of protected waters, would drastically reduce the protection of important
types of waters such as isolated wetlands and intermittent streams. The
Georgia Conservancy’s issues committee strongly opposed this action
and in January, we submitted comments to the administration in opposition
to such a move. We extend thanks to members and trustees who expressed
their opinions to help uphold the authority of the Clean Water Act. In
addition, special appreciation goes to Congressman John Lewis for his
support of the Clean Water Authority Restoration Act, introduced to reaffirm
the federal agencies’ authority to protect waters of the US.
We are very pleased that the administration reconsidered the rulemaking
and will continue to encourage withdrawal of the guidance instructing
federal staff.
The press release is available on the EPA
website.
This New York Times Editorial contains
additional information about the issue.
top | back
|